Mastercard, Visa Dealt Setback in U.K. Retailer Fees Suit
(Bloomberg) -- A British appeals court ruled in favor of retailers including J Sainsbury Plc in a blow to credit card firms that could now face billions of pounds in damages.
The fees fixed by Visa Inc. and Mastercard Inc. restrict competition and are unlawful, Judge Terence Etherton said today in London.
The ruling, which also involved Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s Asda and Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc, resolved wildly different decisions by judges in the lower courts. The case now goes back to a specialty competition judge to reconsider whether the restrictive practices were justified in the interests of economic efficiency.
"The ruling is a clear blow to Mastercard and Visa, though it left open the possibility to reduce their exposure to damages," said Aitor Ortiz, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence.
At issue is the use of so-called interchange fees, levied by banks at rates set by the card companies each time a consumer's plastic is swiped at a register. The fees are then passed on to the retailers. Mastercard faces at least 10 lawsuits filed by retailers in the U.K. totaling as much as $2 billion in claims, according to Bloomberg Intelligence.
Lawyers for the retailers at Stewarts said the ruling “unequivocally recognized that the fixing of interchange fees by MasterCard and its network members over many years was and is an unlawful infringement of competition law.”
In a statement, Mastercard emphasized that the appeals court ruling isn't final and the issue will be reviewed by the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
“We continue to firmly believe that retailers derive real value from our network,” the Purchase, New York-based company said in a statement. Visa declined to comment after the ruling.
Visa had been seeking to uphold a 2017 ruling by Judge Stephen Phillips, who said the transactions are legal. But the retailers succeeded in persuading the appeals court to side with a group of specialty antitrust judges at the CAT who in 2016 ruled that Mastercard owed Sainsbury's 69 million pounds ($91 million).
The tribunal, which will consider at what level the fees could be set if any, should take note that Sainsbury's accepted at its trial that fee levels of 0.2 percent for debit cards and 0.19 percent for credit cards would be lawful, the judge said.
"The card companies will likely pay damages only for the amount above these levels," BI's Ortiz said. The ruling confirms existing European Union “case law as regards to swipe fees and it won't help Visa and MasterCard in their ongoing antitrust probes."
The case is Sainsbury's v Visa Europe, U.K. Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Case No: A3/2017/3493.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jonathan Browning in London at jbrowning9@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Anthony Aarons at aaarons@bloomberg.net, Peter Chapman
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.