Lower Offshore Oil Royalties Urged by U.S. Advisory Panel
(Bloomberg) -- Oil executives urged the Trump administration to slash the rates their companies pay to harvest natural gas and crude from beneath U.S. waters.Â
The U.S. Interior Department's royalty policy committee, filled with industry representatives, voted Wednesday to recommend cutting rates for offshore oil and gas production by about a third, to 12.5 percent.
When Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke recommissioned the panel last year, he raised the possibility the group would encourage an increase in the royalties that companies pay the U.S government for oil, gas and other resources extracted from public land and waters.
It did the opposite.
The panel also urged the Interior Department to create a better, "more workable process" for paring royalties on the oil and gas flowing from aging fields and particularly costly projects.
The recommendations, approved after a day-long meeting in Houston, will be submitted to Zinke for further action.
The moves are seen as potentially helping make U.S. waters more competitive with other offshore hotspots around the world, including Mexico's portion of the Gulf of Mexico. Oil companies hunting for new crude discoveries in U.S. Gulf waters have been pushed into deeper depths, where ultra-high pressures strain the capacity of equipment, make wells harder to drill and increase costs.
Read More: Trump's Oil Plan Will Struggle to Lure Rigs From Guyana
The group also urged the Interior Department to swiftly sell drilling rights in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge's so-called 1002 area "as soon as practicable," following Congress' decision to mandate the auctions last year. Because harsh weather conditions in Alaska can compound any delays, it's important to start as soon as possible, said John Crowther, a policy adviser with the Alaska Department of Natural Resources.
The 20-member committee urged the Interior Department to move more quickly to approve drilling permits and other energy projects on federal land, in part by waiving some environmental reviews. Instead of hiking royalties for onshore energy projects, the Interior Department should "focus its efforts on removing obstacles" to development, one of the group's subcommittees said.
The proposed changes came under fire from environmentalists and good government groups.
Pam Eaton, a senior adviser for energy and climate at The Wilderness Society, said the panel's recommendations appeared to be "promoting fossil energy and maximizing private value at public expense."
Ryan Alexander, the president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, said the committee's recommended changes appear to reflect the wishes of industry stakeholders -- not the broader public. A royalty rate decrease "is likely to dramatically reduce revenue for taxpayers for decades to come without any guarantee of increased industry interest" or production, she said in prepared remarks.
Six of the committee members hail from the energy industry, including representatives from ConocoPhillips Co., Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and coal miner Cloud Peak Energy Inc. Other members represent states, universities and tribes.
Most offshore oil and gas leases carry a royalty rate of 18.75 percent today -- a number established under former President George W. Bush. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management imposed a 12.5 percent royalty on some shallow-water leases offered during an August auction of Gulf of Mexico tracts.
The panel, tasked with ensuring "the public receives the full value of the natural resources produced from federal lands,"Â will continue evaluating possible changes to federal coal leasing and a possible recommendation that Interior aim to develop 20 gigawatts worth of offshore wind power projects.
To contact the reporter on this story: Jennifer A. Dlouhy in Washington at jdlouhy1@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Jon Morgan at jmorgan97@bloomberg.net, Bill Faries
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.