Los Angeles Calls Bluff on $2 Billion DOJ Wheelchair-Access Suit
(Bloomberg) -- Los Angeles is calling the U.S.'s bluff in a $2 billion lawsuit over allegations it failed to use federal funding to provide accessible housing for people with disabilities.
The city is asking a judge on Wednesday to throw out the government's complaint, primarily because the Housing and Urban Development Department simply doesn't base its entitlement grants on compliance with federal accessibility laws.
HUD has continued to release funds and to pursue an administrative solution with the city while aware of possible non-compliance issues, according to Los Angeles, just as it has done in the past with any other municipality facing similar questions.
The Justice Department's decision to join the whistle-blower lawsuit last year, more than six years after the initial complaint was filed by a woman in a wheelchair, is one of many legal disputes that have erupted between the Trump administration and California, most of them over the state's more progressive policies regarding immigration and environmental regulation.
Governor Moonbeam's Got One Fight Left in Him -- Against Trump
Including a complaint filed Tuesday against the Environmental Protection Agency over its intention to lower vehicle-emission standards, California has filed 32 lawsuits since Trump took office. For its part, the government has threatened to withhold funding from Los Angeles for its so-called sanctuary city policies and sued the state for the same reason -- failing to enforce a federal crackdown on undocumented immigrants.
Separately, the administration has sought to cut the very HUD funds it's ostensibly defending in the Los Angeles case. The Justice Department is adamant that the suit isn't politically motivated.
“This investigation was initiated under the prior administration after the filing of a private whistle-blower suit, and has been conducted by career employees in the Department of Justice,” spokeswoman Lauren Ehrsam said. “It is a serious matter and we will pursue it as we would any similar case based on facts and the law.”
Los Angeles says the government's lawsuit is about money, not about helping the disabled, and it will only worsen the severe housing crisis in the second-largest U.S. city.
“Clearly, the complaint does not seek to ameliorate the suffering of even one ‘Angeleno with a disability'; it seeks to take funding out of Los Angeles, a result that would inflict and exacerbate suffering on those most in need of protection on an enormous scale,” according to the city's request to dismiss the lawsuit.
HUD meanwhile is cutting the bulk of the grants that the Justice Department alleges Los Angeles failed to use to create housing that met minimal accessibility requirements. The department's proposed 2019 budget adds up to $42.2 billion in outlays, compared with $55.5 billion in 2017.
Representatives of the city and HUD declined to comment on the suit.
The case is U.S. v. City of Los Angeles, 11-cv-00974, U.S. District Court, Central District of California (Los Angeles).
To contact the reporter on this story: Edvard Pettersson in Los Angeles at epettersson@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Elizabeth Wollman at ewollman@bloomberg.net, Peter Blumberg
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.