Kellyanne Conway Valued Polling Firm at $5 Million, Filing Shows
(Bloomberg) -- Kellyanne Conway, counselor to President Donald Trump, said her consulting firm was worth as much as $5 million, with clients including a super-PAC funded by conservative mega-donor Robert Mercer, according to financial disclosures released Friday by the White House.
Conway earned $800,726 last year via her firm, Polling Company/Woman Trend, which had more than 70 clients over the past two years, according to the disclosure. The clients included conservative political groups funded by Chicago Cubs owner Joseph Ricketts and billionaires Charles and David Koch.
Ethics rules enacted by the Trump administration require appointees to recuse themselves from matters involving former clients for two years. The Polling Company/Woman Trend said Jan. 20 that Conway had resigned from the company.
Overall, Conway disclosed assets owned by her and her husband, George Conway III, worth between $10 million and $39.3 million. Conway's firm earned $1.1 million from the Trump campaign in 2016 and $328,000 from Make America Number 1, a super-PAC initially formed to back the candidacy of Texas Senator Ted Cruz, according to filings with the Federal Election Commission. Mercer, a hedge fund operator and prolific political contributor, donated $4.5 million to the super political action committee in 2016.
Advocacy Group
Conway and another key White House adviser, Steve Bannon, have served as longtime advisers to Mercer. The Polling Company lists Reclaim New York, an advocacy group set up by Mercer's family to promote transparency and tax cuts, as a client on its website.
Reclaim New York shares an address with Cambridge Analytica, a data and analytics firm that, like Conway's firm, worked for both the Trump campaign and Make America Number 1, according to filings made with the FEC. Conway served as the super-PAC's president until July 2016, when she joined the Trump campaign as a senior adviser. Bannon reported receiving more than $125,000 in consulting fees for work on behalf of Cambridge Analytica on his disclosure, which covered 2016 and part of this year.
Conway played a central role in Trump's run for the White House. She took over as campaign manager in August when her predecessor, Paul Manafort, stepped down amid sinking poll numbers and controversy over his past work for a pro-Russian political party in Ukraine. Bannon was named the campaign's CEO at the same time.
The Polling Company continued to bill the super-PAC after Conway joined Trump's campaign, which paid her through the firm. In October, the Campaign Legal Center, a group that supports tighter restrictions on money in politics, filed a complaint with the FEC claiming that the arrangement violated federal election law, which bars candidates from coordinating with super-PACs that support them. The use of a common vendor can be a violation of those rules. FEC rules bar the agency from commenting on pending enforcement matters.
Employee Firewall
Conway said at the time that her company had done surveys for the super-PAC and there was a firewall between employees working for the Trump campaign and those working for Make America Number 1. The super-PAC made its last payment to her firm in late August.
Conway was a frequent on-air spokeswoman for Trump, a role that she has continued since joining the White House. She was criticized in February when she offered a “free commercial” for Ivanka Trump's clothing line during an interview on Fox News Channel. Members of both major parties said the remarks ran afoul of federal ethics laws, which bar government employees from using their positions to endorse products.
The White House chose to counsel Conway rather than discipline her, which could have included reprimand, suspension, demotion or removal from office. Walter Shaub, OGE's director, criticized that decision, saying that it “risks undermining the ethics program.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Bill Allison in Washington at ballison14@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Joshua Gallu at jgallu@bloomberg.net, John Voskuhl
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.
-
When Everyone Has AI, What Gives You An Edge?
India's young workforce is entering an uncertain world of work where powerful AI tools are becoming widely accessible. The advantage will belong to those who combine deep expertise with digital fluency, and the distinctly human capabilities that technology cannot manufacture.