Tapestry Sinks Amid Struggles at Kate Spade, Stuart Weitzman
(Bloomberg) -- Tapestry Inc., the company formerly known as Coach, is running into big hurdles in its quest to win back shoppers.
Same-store sales at Tapestry's Kate Spade brand missed analysts' estimates in the latest quarter, while production delays and other problems at the Stuart Weitzman brand were a drag as well. Same-store sales for the Coach brand, its biggest business, met projections, but the downbeat smaller brands and a full-year profit warning disappointed investors.
The results sent Tapestry shares down as much as 14 percent to $46 in New York Tuesday, the biggest intraday decline since August. They had climbed 22 percent this year through Monday's close.
“Revenue is bound to suffer” as Tapestry pulls back on wholesale distribution and reduces flash sales at Kate Spade, said Neil Saunders, an analyst at GlobalData Retail. “Nevertheless, we support the strategic direction and believe that this corrective action is ultimately necessary to strengthen the brand.”
Under Chief Executive Officer Victor Luis, Tapestry has re-engineered itself as a house of three luxury fashion brands: Coach, Kate Spade and Stuart Weitzman. Coach has been pulling back from over-discounting and is benefiting from the sale of more full-price products. Kate Spade has also sacrificed short-term results as it tries to wean customers off of markdowns.
Tapestry is recovering from an extended period of weakness after its leather goods became cheaper and ubiquitous. The swift rise of competition from rivals such as Michael Kors Holdings Ltd. led to heavy discounting as the handbag brands battled each other over customers.
Tapestry forecast full-year adjusted per-share earnings of $2.57 to $2.60, moving up the lower end of the range from $2.52. Analysts had expected $2.61 on average.
Stuart Weitzman
Stuart Weitzman was plagued by issues with production delays and style misses, the company said. In an interview Tuesday, Luis said the “lack of freshness” in new versions of the label's over-the-knee boots and sandals stifled sales.
“We're seeing some bumps in the road in the development and delivery of new product,” he said.
Tapestry expects the shoe label's problems to persist through next winter and return to growth in the second half of fiscal 2019. New creative director Giovanni Morelli's first new line will reach store shelves this summer. The goal is still to build a $1 billion brand, Luis said.
Saunders, at GlobalData Retail, said the issues at the shoemaker didn't only reduce sales, they “also weakened overall interest in the brand,” he said.
Coach Results
Coach's same-store sales, a key metric, gained 3 percent in the period that ended March 31, the company said in the statement. The measure for Kate Spade fell 9 percent, compared with estimates for a 6.9 percent decline.
Tapestry bought Kate Spade for $2.4 billion in 2017 and has spent the past months folding its operations into the parent company. In November, Tapestry said it expects about $100 million to $115 million in cost savings in fiscal 2019 from the integration of Kate Spade.
New senior executives run each of Tapestry's three brands now. Last year, it hired Neiman Marcus Group Ltd. veteran Joshua Schulman to run Coach. In March, it brought on former Michael Kors executive Anna Bakst to run Kate Spade. Three weeks later, Stuart Weitzman announced that its new CEO would be Eraldo Poletto, previously of Italian fashion label Salvatore Ferragamo.
Excluding some items, profit was 54 cents a share, compared with projections for 50 cents. Revenue of $1.32 billion topped the average $1.31 billion estimate.
To contact the reporter on this story: Kim Bhasin in New York at kbhasin4@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Anne Riley Moffat at ariley17@bloomberg.net, John J. Edwards III, Lisa Wolfson
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.