Supreme Court Justices Grapple With Virginia Uranium-Mining Ban
(Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Supreme Court gave a mostly favorable reception to a Virginia law that bans mining at the nation's largest known uranium deposit, as the justices weighed a challenge pressed by the owners of the property with help from the Trump administration.
Hearing arguments in Washington Monday, the justices considered whether Virginia's uranium-mining ban runs afoul of the U.S. Atomic Energy Act, a 1954 law that gives federal regulators power over nuclear safety.
Virginia says the 1954 law didn't affect the longstanding power of states to regulate mining of all types. The landowners contend the state's law, though phrased as a ban on mining, was actually driven by radiological safety concerns over the process of milling the ore and the disposition of mine waste known as tailings.
Justices from across the court's ideological divide said they were reluctant to scrutinize the reasons behind a state measure. Justice Neil Gorsuch said he was “hard pressed” to find many examples of the Supreme Court trying to determine a state legislature's motives.
“It seems to present real opportunities for gamesmanship as well, sort of bad incentives for a state,” Justice Elena Kagan told the landowners' lawyer, Charles Cooper. “Just cover over your purpose?”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor even wondered aloud whether state lawmakers would have to be questioned under oath about their motives.
But Justice Stephen Breyer said courts often try to discern what a statute's purpose is.
“When you say don't look at purpose, there I get off the boat because I think that's our job as a court in a relevant case, to determine what the purpose of the statute is,” Breyer told Virginia Solicitor General Toby Heytens.
The Trump administration's top Supreme Court lawyer, Solicitor General Noel Francisco, told the justices the key question was whether the state had a “plausible non-safety rationale” for its law.
The property, about 30 miles north of the North Carolina border in Pittsylvania County, was once owned by Thomas Jefferson. It's now controlled by Virginia Energy Resources Inc. and the family of Walter Coles Sr. The Coles family first learned there might be uranium on the property in the 1970s.
The site contains an estimated 119 million pounds of uranium. Once valued at $6 billion, the deposit could displace the imports that now constitute 90 percent of the uranium used by the nation's nuclear power plants.
Virginia first banned uranium mining in 1982 following the Three Mile Island nuclear power station meltdown near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, three years earlier.
The case is Virginia Uranium v. Warren, 16-1275.
--With assistance from Ari Natter.
To contact the reporter on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at gstohr@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Joe Sobczyk at jsobczyk@bloomberg.net, Laurie Asséo, Elizabeth Wasserman
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.