Manila Office Workers Consider Dorms to Cope With World’s Worst Traffic
(Bloomberg) -- Nearly half of working professionals in the Philippines capital region consider living in a dormitory to avoid traffic jams, according to property services company Colliers International Group Inc.
About 45% of respondents in a Colliers survey are “willing to stay in a co-living facility” as financial and personal costs of worsening traffic in Metro Manila mount, research manager Joey Bondoc said at a briefing on Wednesday.
Workers spend as much as 4,500 pesos ($89) monthly on commuting and are on the road for more than three hours for a one-way trip, Bondoc said. They are willing to spend as much as 6,000 pesos to live in a dormitory-type lodging closer to work, he said.
The Philippine capital region is set to top Waze Inc.'s 2019 ranking of the world's worst cities to drive in, beating the likes of Bogota and Jakarta. Worsening mobility in Manila has prompted builders from Ayala Land Inc. to SM Prime Holdings Inc. to offer worker dormitories.
It Takes Five Minutes to Drive a Kilometer in Metro Manila
Colliers, which tracks co-living spaces in three districts in Metro Manila, forecasts beds in shared accommodations to rise by 51% to 11,010 in the two years to 2021.
Some professionals are also considering sharing with friends a studio or one-bedroom apartment in key business districts, Bondoc said.
Builders which offer dormitories “should start offering differentiating features” such as fitness centers and private lounges to compete, he said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Siegfrid Alegado in Manila at aalegado1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Cecilia Yap at cyap19@bloomberg.net, Clarissa Batino
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
-
The Curious Case of Equitas Small Finance Bank And A CEO Who Quit For Stock
PN Vasudevan believes persistent investor concerns over a perceived conflict of interest had become a governance overhang on Equitas Small Finance Bank's stock, even as the lender improved profitability and asset quality.
-
Talking Points This Week: AI Cash Burn, A Tiger Comeback And An India That Still Finds Its Own Path
India is not immune to higher oil or tighter global liquidity, yet its earnings base is broader, its domestic policy levers are still available.
-
Foreign Investors Own Half Of HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank. An LTCG Cut Could Matter Most Here
Foreign portfolio investors have US$115 billion parked in HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank. If the government cuts long-term capital gains tax, Jefferies says returning foreign money could land here first.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
Why Prashant Jain's 3P Investment Managers Bought 2.5% Stake In This Healthcare Firm
After slowing acquisitions, Entero now has the opportunity to extract greater value from the network. The key, however, will be execution.
-
Taxing A Promise: The Unsettled Story Of GST On Corporate Guarantees
These concerns are particularly relevant for businesses in the infrastructure, real estate, power and EPC sectors, where guarantees run for several years over the duration of the project and involve substantial amounts.
-
Who Will Care When Women Work? That Is The Wrong Question
The debate on women and work becomes strangely patronising when even our most enlightened elites assume that care is a woman's natural duty.
-
AI Disruption Is Exponential, Businesses Need A Margin Of Safety: HDFC AMC's Navneet Munot
According to Munot, one of the biggest challenges in assessing AI's impact is that the pace of change is exponential rather than linear.
-
The AI Race Is Bigger Than AI Models | The Week In Whys
The AI race and the humanoid race may look like two different technology stories. But underneath, they are increasingly about the same thing: who controls the ecosystem needed to build the technology.
