Glencore Is Whacked By Washington
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Glencore PLC's shares have long suffered from a “DRC discount.” Investors have been spooked by the prospect of its mining operations in the Democratic Republic of Congo — a volatile country with a reputation for corruption — landing the company in hot water one day.
Analysts expect that the Swiss-based mining and trading group will generate about $26 billion of free cash flow over the next three years. But its market value is only 8 times this year's estimated earnings. And, as of Tuesday, its stock-price markdown has a new name: the “DOJ discount.”
Glencore said it had received a subpoena from the U.S. Department of Justice demanding that it hand over a decade's worth of records on its activities in Congo, Venezuela and Nigeria. At issue is whether it complied properly with anti-corruption and money laundering statutes. The shares tanked as much as 13 percent after its statement.
Yet anyone who has bought London-listed Glencore's shares has done so in the knowledge that something like this might happen. Trading 90 commodities in 50 countries means you're doing business in places where bribery is not uncommon. In its 2011 IPO prospectus, Glencore summarized the risks as follows:
Glencore's marketing operations are large in scale, which may make fraudulent or accidental transactions difficult to detect. In addition, some of Glencore's industrial activities are located in countries where corruption is generally understood to exist.
Congo (where Glencore has copper and cobalt mines) and Venezuela and Nigeria (where it traded oil) all rank near the bottom of Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index.
It's also been clear for a while now that Dan Gertler, an Israeli billionaire and Glencore's former business partner in Congo, is persona non grata in the U.S., which put blocking sanctions on him in December. Bloomberg News reported in May that Glencore might also face a bribery investigation in the U.K. over its dealings with Gertler. Both Gertler and Glencore have denied wrongdoing in relation to securing valuable mining investments in the country.
Yet Glencore has been trying to assure investors that the Gertler situation is under control. It severed ties with the tycoon last year. Then — somewhat strangely — it resumed royalty payments to him last month, on the rather hopeful proviso that they would be paid in euros rather than dollars. The unstated implication was that this arrangement had the tacit blessing of the U.S. Part of Glencore's argument no doubt centered on the possibility of important Congolese cobalt mines falling into Chinese hands.
If it's true that the Swiss giant had got the okay from American officials, then it appears that various parts of the U.S. government aren't singing from the same hymn sheet. The Office of Foreign Assets Control, which oversees enforcement of the economic sanctions pertinent to the Gertler case, is part of the U.S. Treasury — not the DOJ. Yet the latter has form when it comes to Congo. In 2016, it issued a $213 million fine to hedge fund Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC related to the bribery of officials there.
It's not clear whether Glencore faces a similar investigation, but investors must think it's a possibility give the sudden selloff on Tuesday.
In some ways, the timing of this is fortunate for Glencore. In 2016, short-sellers were betting that the company's mountain of debt might cause it to collapse. Net debt is now a more manageable $10.7 billion, or less than one year's earnings. So it should be able to cope with even a very large fine — painful as that would be.
But whether you call it the DRC discount or the DOJ discount, the valuation markdown looks like a permanent feature of Glencore's landscape.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Boxell at jboxell@bloomberg.net
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.