Fortis Healthcare’s Auditor Raises Three Red Flags
The statutory auditor to Fortis Healthcare Ltd. has raised three important issues pertaining to the company's financial earnings for the quarter and nine months ended Dec. 31, 2017.
In the auditor review report, accompanying the earnings statements, Deloitte, Haskins & Sells LLP said that due to the significance of the matters relating to the ongoing investigations, to loans given and recoverability of certain vendor advances, “we have not been able to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to form a conclusion on the Statement and hence we do not express a conclusion on the Statement”.
The Statement here refers to the company's Statement Of Unaudited Financial Results
Also Read: Fortis Healthcare Reports Weak Second And Third Quarter Earnings
Fortis Healthcare declares earnings for July-September and October-December quarters. pic.twitter.com/jM8ZtzoKG5
February 28, 2018Ongoing Investigations
Fortis' filing with the stock exchanges stated that the company's Audit and Risk Management Committee has appointed an external legal firm to investigate -
- Inter-corporate deposits given by a wholly-owned subsidiary of the parent
- Intra-group and related party transactions
- Evaluation of implications of a recent legal notice
The company said it has also received communication from market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India and the Registrar of Companies asking for information regarding certain inter-corporate deposits. SEBI has launched an investigation into the same, the company disclosed.
Pending completion of these investigations, Deloitte said it was unable to conclude on the impact on financial results.
In its response to the auditor's comment, the management said the effect of the outcome of the investigations on the financial results will be dealt with when the investigations are over.Also Read: Singh Brothers Say They Need Time To Resolve Issues
Inter-Corporate Loans
Fortis stated in the filing that its wholly owned subsidiary Fortis Hospitals Ltd. had on July 1, 2017 invested Rs 472.43 crore treasury funds with three companies. The inter-corporate deposits were for a period of 90 days and were defaulted on the due date of Sept. 29. Fortis Hospitals assigned the outstanding balances to another company on Sept. 30, and the money was to be received on March 31, 2018. But the assignment agreement was cancelled on Jan. 5, 2018 and the loan balance plus accrued interest of Rs 27.72 crore reverted to Fortis Hospitals. Meanwhile on Dec. 15, 2017 the three companies became part of the Fortis promoter group and the transactions recognised as related party transactions. So far Fortis Hospitals has received Rs 70 crore from one of the companies.
Commenting on these transactions, Deloitte said it was unable to conclude whether the grant of inter-corporate deposits was in compliance with the company's internal policy, on the recoverability of these deposits and the possible effect on the financials of the company.
The management asserted in its statement that the deposits are secured and it “considers the outstanding amount as recoverable in due course”.
Also Read: Delhi High Court Setback For Singh Brothers
Unsecured Advances To Vendors
The auditor's review report also drew attention to unsecured advances of Rs 57.76 crore from certain vendors where recoveries have been delayed.
“In the absence of any security and delays in recoveries, we are unable to conclude on the recoverability of the said advances,” said Deloitte.
Fortis has delayed the release of the July-September earnings and clubbed them with the financials for October-December quarter. After a late board meeting on Wednesday, that started at 10 p.m. and concluded at 11 p.m., Fortis filed financials for both quarters with the stock exchanges.
Also Read: Why Brokerages Remain Bullish On Fortis Despite Founders' Troubles
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
