Ford Boosts CEO's Pay 19% as Shares Lag Amid Costly Overhaul
(Bloomberg) -- Ford Motor Co. increased Chief Executive Officer Mark Fields's compensation by 19 percent last year as heavy spending to develop self-driving cars and electric vehicles weighs on profits.
Fields received $18.8 million in salary, bonus and stock, Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford said Friday in a regulatory filing. Including the value of his pension and other compensation, the total was $22.1 million, compared with $18.6 million in 2015.
The 56-year-old CEO is leading an overhaul of Ford's business model so the company can take on self-driving cars from the likes of Alphabet Inc.'s Waymo and Uber Technologies Inc. Fields has warned the cost of investing in new technologies would reduce profits last year and this year before rebounding in 2018. The hefty spending as the U.S. auto market plateaus contributed to Ford shares slumping 14 percent last year.
“All these investments in electrification and mobility are going to be a drag on earnings for quite a while and that is holding the stock back,” said David Whiston, a Morningstar Inc. analyst. “But as a shareholder, you have to understand you're paying Mark for the future. You're paying him to get the mobility business up and running.”
Top executives reached 76 percent of the targets set for them by the Ford's board, according to the proxy. While management exceeded goals for automotive operating margin and cash flow, they achieved just 8 percent of their target for automotive revenue and also fell short on Ford Credit pretax profit and quality.
Since Fields became CEO on July 1, 2014, the shares have fallen 32 percent through Thursday's close, as the Standard & Poor's 500 Index rose 20 percent.
Thanks to strong sales of sport utility vehicles and pickups, Ford posted pretax earnings of $10.4 billion last year. That was the second-best result in company history, though down $400 million from 2015.
Ford said last week that pretax earnings will fall 13 percent this year to $9 billion, due in part to $295 million in recall costs during the first quarter.
“They have good numbers, a good balance sheet and a good cash position,” said Whiston, who rates Ford shares a hold. “But I tell investors there's not a lot of reason to get overly excited this year for a meaningful rise” in the stock price.
Fields was among the first auto executives to warn last year that U.S. sales had peaked and would begin a gradual descent after seven years of gains.
Sales Candor
“I appreciate their candor, even if I don't really like what they're saying,” Whiston said. “At least they're not over promising and under delivering, which would be even worse for the stock.”
Executive Chairman Bill Ford received total compensation of $13.9 million for 2016, about 8 percent more than a year earlier. Excluding pension values and other compensation, pay for the 59-year-old great-grandson of founder Henry Ford rose 10 percent to $11.1 million.
For the second consecutive year, Ford didn't grant stock options, following a trend among its key competitors and other companies of instead awarding some compensation in restricted shares. One quarter of the stock awards to Ford's top executives came in restricted shares that pay out over three years.
Ford scheduled its annual meeting for May 11 and it will be conducted online. Shareholders for the 13th consecutive year will consider a proposal to strip the Ford family of its 40 percent voting control and move to one vote per share. The measure is opposed by Ford's board, which includes two family members, Bill Ford and his cousin Edsel Ford II.
To contact the reporter on this story: Keith Naughton in Southfield, Michigan at knaughton3@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Craig Trudell at ctrudell1@bloomberg.net, Anne Riley Moffat
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.
-
When Everyone Has AI, What Gives You An Edge?
India's young workforce is entering an uncertain world of work where powerful AI tools are becoming widely accessible. The advantage will belong to those who combine deep expertise with digital fluency, and the distinctly human capabilities that technology cannot manufacture.