For Tencent, Spotify's More Bob Dylan and Less Beyonce
(Bloomberg Gadfly) -- A listing of Spotify Technology SA shares might not be the smash for Tencent Holdings Ltd. you'd think.
Like singer, songwriter and Nobel Prize winner Bob Dylan -- who never had a No. 1 hit -- Spotify may end up being a slow winner for the Chinese internet giant rather than a Beyonce-level chart topper.
Spotify's non-IPO filing shows Tencent owns 7.5 percent of the music-streaming service via its Tencent Music Entertainment Group. The 13.4 million shares would be worth as much as $1.77 billion if you took the highest price at which equity has traded in private transactions.
That's not bad, except that at this top-end price of $132.50, it's a mere 5.5 percent higher than the amount Tencent paid to acquire 8.6 million newly issued shares back in December. Complicating the valuation, however, is the fact that the rest of Tencent's stake came from purchasing shares from an existing holder.
Technically, those 4.8 million other shares came from a two-step transaction: The original investor redeemed convertible notes for stock, then sold it to Tencent. The conversion price was around $62.71 per share, according to Bloomberg Gadfly calculations, but that doesn't mean Tencent bought at this value. The earlier shareholder may have sold them at a premium.
Assuming no markup, then Tencent actually paid $1.38 billion for its stake, or around $103 a share. So a pricing at the top end of the recent transaction history and zero markup would give Tencent a paper profit of around 28 percent.
There are two caveats to that, though.
First, there were only 2.7 million Spotify shares traded in private transactions during the period (this year through Feb. 22) at which that upper-end price was struck. Tencent owns almost five times that amount. Of course, having the shares trade publicly has the potential to add much-needed liquidity, possibly boosting the price. Or not. There's no lockup period, meaning existing shareholders are free to dump stock immediately if they wish.
Which brings us to the second caveat. Tencent is the only shareholder that's locked in. Even founders Daniel Ek and Martin Lorentzon can sell their ordinary shares -- equivalent to 38.9 percent of those outstanding -- from day one. Tencent must wait until Dec. 15, 2020.
We know Tencent didn't get into Spotify for short-term share price gains, rather for long-term strategic goals.
In fact, the larger chunk of the investment -- 8.6 million shares -- wasn't done via cash but a share swap. Spotify received a 9 percent stake in Tencent Music Entertainment as part of that Dec. 15 transaction. In its filing, Spotify valued this share-swap deal at 910 million euros, worth $1.07 billion at that day's exchange rate.
This reveals another important metric. The share-swap transaction values Tencent Music Entertainment at $12.3 billion, 20 percent more than the $10 billion figure being talked about at the end of last year.
When Spotify does start to trade in New York, Tencent will be the only investor unable to cash out should there be some Beyonce-esque excitement. Although if Spotify starts to churn out profitable ballads over coming years, that may suit it just fine.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Tim Culpan is a technology columnist for Bloomberg Gadfly. He previously covered technology for Bloomberg News.
Tencent got million new Spotify shares for million euro, equivalent to per share on the day. It was a stock-swap deal; the million euro valuation is from Spotify's filing.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Katrina Nicholas at knicholas2@bloomberg.net.
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.