CVS Ordered by U.S. Judge to Defend Consummating Aetna Deal
(Bloomberg) -- CVS Health Corp. and Aetna Inc., which completed their merger last week before getting court approval for a settlement with the Justice Department, were ordered by a federal judge to justify combining their operations.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington set a hearing for Dec. 18 where he will consider ordering the companies to keep their assets separate until he weighs approval of the antitrust settlement with the government, a process that could take months.
The ruling complicates CVS's plans for the Aetna acquisition, a $68 billion deal that creates a health-care giant with a hand in insurance, prescription-drug benefits and drugstores across the U.S. CVS closed the takeover on Nov. 28 after obtaining final regulatory approvals and now faces the prospect that its plans for the combined company will be put on hold.
“CVS Health and Aetna are one company, and our focus is on transforming the consumer health experience,” CVS said in a statement, without commenting further.
At a hearing last week, Leon chided the companies and the Justice Department for treating him like a “rubber stamp.” He complained he was “being kept in the dark” about the closing of the merger.
CVS, Aetna Closed Their Deal. Somebody Didn't Tell the Judge
The Justice Department cleared the deal in October after requiring the sale of Aetna's Medicare prescription-drug plans to WellCare Health Plans Inc. The sale is intended to address the government's concerns that the merger would otherwise harm competition.
A federal law known as the Tunney Act requires court approval of settlements the Justice Department reaches with merging companies to resolve competition problems. The law doesn't prohibit companies from closing and integrating operations while the settlement is considered. The risk is that a settlement is rejected, requiring revisions to the agreement or the unwinding of the merger.
Leon said at Monday's hearing that the Justice Department's concerns about the Aetna deal, which focused on the companies' competing Medicare prescription drug plans, may have been too narrow.
The Justice Department is defending CVS and Aetna's decision to combine. It said in a court filing that it's not necessary to keep their businesses separate given that the sale to WellCare is complete. The head of the department's antitrust division, Makan Delrahim, attended the hearing.
“Requiring CVS to hold the Aetna assets separate would also delay any efficiencies that the merger might produce and, under the circumstances of this case, create unnecessary uncertainty for consumers, employees, and shareholders,” the government said.
To contact the reporter on this story: David McLaughlin in Washington at dmclaughlin9@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Glovin at dglovin@bloomberg.net, Joe Schneider
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.