The Fed's Guns Have Been Spiked By Reluctant Friends
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- The U.S. Federal Reserve delivered a bombshell rate cut on Tuesday, as it braced for the impact of the coronavirus outbreak on the American economy. There are legitimate doubts over whether central bank action will make much difference in an emergency that's primarily medical. But to the extent that monetary policy can help, it's regrettable that the Fed had to act alone, and not in coordination with other central banks.
The Covid-19 epidemic is a truly global shock with truly global consequences. There are, of course, differences in timing: The outbreak originated in China, which may now be past the worst. Most new registered cases are coming from South Korea, Italy and Iran. Other countries, including France, Germany, the U.K. and the U.S., have just started to prepare for a steep increase in contagion. The World Health Organization may have not have labelled the disease a “pandemic,” but we don't look far from that point.
The finance ministers and central bankers from the world's seven main economies held a conference call on Tuesday. For all the choreography, the meeting produced little. The officials reaffirmed their boilerplate commitment to “use all appropriate policy tools,” including fiscal policy, but they fell short of taking action. The response to the emergency is undoubtedly complex. It is not clear how long the damage will last, nor whether it will have more impact on supply chains than on consumer demand (which matters hugely to inflation predictions). But at a time of severe crisis, this was a spectacular failure of international coordination.
The Fed's move was therefore a lot less powerful than it might have been. Imagine if all central banks had chosen to take action simultaneously, as they did during the global financial crisis or after the tsunami in Japan in 2011. Finance ministers should have also joined in, outlining their plans for a coordinated fiscal response. Clearly, this would not solve a medical emergency. But it would have assuaged some fears over the ability of policymakers to stand united to protect the world's economy and to act fast in a crisis.
Europe's top officials bear a large chunk of the blame. On Monday, Ursula von der Leyen, European Commission President, set out plans for a task force to combat the epidemic. But most governments — with the laudable exception of Italy — have yet to explain how much money they're willing to commit to fighting this emergency. Euro zone finance ministers will hold a conference call on Wednesday. One hopes that the result is less disheartening than the one from the G-7 gathering.
The European Central Bank is also looking behind the curve. The ECB was the last of all the major central banks to state its willingness to intervene if needed — and its choice of wording was especially feeble. The fear is that President Christine Lagarde may have caved in to the traditional stubborn reluctance of some national central banks, such as Germany's Bundesbank, to expand monetary policy.
Mario Draghi, Lagarde's predecessor, was willing to sacrifice consensus in order to act decisively. When the ECB governing council meets next week for its regular policy meeting, Lagarde — who is more of a politician than Draghi — may need to show whether she's willing to do the same. A large-scale scheme to provide liquidity to small- and medium-sized enterprises is the least the ECB can do. An interest rate cut and an increase in the size of asset purchases should also be on the cards.
There is no guarantee that these policy responses would actually work. The stock market may initially take any dramatic steps from policymakers as a sign that the outlook is worse than feared — as it seemed to do on Tuesday following the Fed's announcement. However, as the human and economic cost of the coronavirus spreads, a bigger risk is minimizing what is happening and acting too late. Europe should lead from the front, not hide at the back.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Boxell at jboxell@bloomberg.net
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Ferdinando Giugliano writes columns on European economics for Bloomberg Opinion. He is also an economics columnist for La Repubblica and was a member of the editorial board of the Financial Times.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.