Companies Facilitating Ransomware Payments Could Face Penalties
(Bloomberg) -- Companies that assist victims of ransomware attacks in making payments to criminal hackers could face penalties, according to a new advisory from the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
The civil penalties would apply to those who assist in making ransom payments on behalf of victim companies or governments hacked by criminal groups that have been sanctioned by the Treasury Department. The new advisory, from the department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, could fundamentally change the calculus for companies -- and their advisers -- after they've been infected with ransomware.
“Companies that facilitate ransomware payments to cyber actors on behalf of victims, including financial institutions, cyber insurance firms, and companies involved in digital forensics and incident response, not only encourage future ransomware payment demands but also may risk violating OFAC regulations,” the Treasury Department said in its new advisory.
Treasury officials didn't respond to messages seeking comment.
Victims of ransomware attacks that make the payments aren't specifically mentioned in the advisory as being subject to civil penalties for paying ransom. However, Treasury Department rules prohibit victims from paying ransom to sanctions entities. These rules haven't changed. What's changed in that the U.S. government threatened to start enforcing these rules, said Joshua Motte, chief executive officer of Coalition Inc., the cyber insurance company.
Ransomware is a type of malware that locks computers and blocks access to files in lieu of a payment. Companies targeted with ransomware must decide whether to pay the ransom, using via cryptocurrency, or find some other way to restore its files and rebuild its computer network. The attacks can be devastating, with the potential to bring company operations to a stop.
From 2018 to 2019, there was a 37% increase in reported ransomware cases and a 147% annual increase in associated losses, according to the FBI.
“The ransomware problem has blown up exponentially over the past two months,” said Charles Carmakal, senior vice president and chief technology officer at the cybersecurity company Mandiant. “Mandiant is aware of over 100 organizations in which ransomware operators had network access to in September alone, more than double what we were aware of in September of the previous year.”
Paying ransom to criminal groups has long existed within a legal gray area. The ransom, which can sometimes be in the millions, are often paid to organized criminal groups in Eastern Europe or Russia. While the FBI discourages paying ransom, the U.S. government hasn't previously punished victims who pay the hackers' demands.
The Treasury Department has issued sanctions on criminal ransomware groups, including last December against Russia-based Evil Corp. That group is suspected of being behind a ransomware attack on smartwatch maker Garmin Ltd. Sky News reported that the cybersecurity company Arete Incident Response, which is based in the U.S., allegedly paid a ransom to Evil Corp. on behalf of Garmin.
Arete didn't respond to a request for comment.
The new advisory could create another headache for companies struck by ransomware -- figuring out if the attackers have been sanctioned by the U.S. It is often difficult to conclusively prove who is behind a ransomware attack, thanks to the obfuscation provided by the internet and the fact that criminal ransomware groups are sometimes skilled hackers who can cover their tracks.
“The intention of the OFAC advisory is positive, but it will certainly add more pressure and complexity to victim organizations already challenged with protecting the confidentiality of their stolen customer data and recovering their business operations after a security incident,” Carmakal said. “The true identity of the cyber criminals extorting victims is usually not known, so it's difficult for organizations to determine if they are unintentionally violating U.S. Treasury sanctions.”
According to the Treasury advisory, companies that notify law enforcement of ransomware attacks may decrease its risk in the event it ends up paying a sanctioned entity.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.