Comcast's Roberts Has Anti-Murdoch Card to Play in Bid for Sky
(Bloomberg) -- As Comcast Chief Executive Officer Brian Roberts makes his case to buy the European pay-TV giant Sky Plc, he has a compelling argument: He's the anti-Rupert Murdoch.
The largest U.S. cable TV company, Comcast has worked to cultivate a nice-guy corporate image, while the reputation of Murdoch and his 21st Century Fox Inc. have been damaged by a British phone-hacking scandal and allegations of sexual harassment in the U.S.
Now, the contrasting images may play a significant role for regulators after Comcast's surprise 22.1 billion-pound ($31 billion) offer for Sky on Tuesday, topping Fox's previous bid. Murdoch planned to have Fox buy the 61 percent of Sky it doesn't already own and sell it, along with the bulk of Fox's film and TV assets, to Walt Disney Co. His plans are in jeopardy now.
“It's not so much that Comcast is a paragon of virtue,” said Craig Moffett, an analyst at MoffettNathanson LLC. “It's simply that they're not Rupert Murdoch.”
The fight over Sky and its 22.9 million customers is the latest battle between Roberts and Murdoch. In 2003, Murdoch acquired a stake in DirecTV, becoming a competitor to Comcast, and then sold it four years later. Starting in late 2015, Comcast dropped Fox's Yes Network, which airs New York Yankees games, for more than a year in a contract dispute.
‘Generally Bland'
While Murdoch has a reputation as a swashbuckling dealmaker willing to challenge incumbents, Roberts and his late father, Ralph Roberts, who often wore a bowtie, are “typically courteous, and generally bland and seldom controversial in public,” according to “Comcasted,” a 2005 book about the family by Joseph DiStefano.
Comcast executives have the “keen ability to represent themselves as whatever the customer, regulator, investor or politician who could help them needs to see,” DiStefano wrote. Cultivating a reputation as “gentlemen” has been “one of their most useful assets.”
That ability to make friends could be crucial if Disney and Fox decide not to counter Comcast's offer for Sky. Then, Roberts will need to win over British regulators and Sky investors. He said Tuesday he respects that the Murdochs may not want to sell their Sky stake to Comcast and will try to win support from independent Sky directors.
His case with regulators will likely be easier to make, analysts say. Fox's Sky bid has faced extensive probes over concerns that owning Sky News would put too much of Britain's media into the hands of the billionaire media baron.
‘Clean Buyers'
Fox has also faced a backlash over harassment allegations at Fox News in the U.S., though U.K. regulators have said those claims shouldn't stop the Sky deal from going ahead.
“Comcast doesn't have any of the baggage that Rupert Murdoch and 21st Century Fox do,” said Paul Sweeney, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. “They're very clean buyers from a regulatory perspective, as is Disney.”
Roberts, 58, also has a reputation as a cutthroat competitor who catches rivals off guard, as he did Tuesday with the Sky offer.
In 2004, he launched an unsuccessful takeover bid for Disney. And in 2014 he swooped in with an offer to buy Time Warner Cable, surprising another bidder, Charter Communications.
A little over a year later, Comcast walked away from that $45.2 billion deal after facing resistance in Washington. Roberts has since tried to improve Comcast's notorious customer service and bolster its reputation with the company's 22.4 million subscribers.
Roberts, Forbes magazine once said, is “a wolf in sheep's clothing.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Gerry Smith in New York at gsmith233@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Crayton Harrison at tharrison5@bloomberg.net, David Papadopoulos at papadopoulos@bloomberg.net, Larry Reibstein
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.