Buyout Firms Explore New Lows in the U.K. Bargain Bin
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Buyout barons are regaining their appetite for U.K. assets and London-listed stocks. They're also becoming more aggressive in their tactics. The idea that British takeover rules are a deterrent to private equity bidders faces a fresh test.
U.K. stocks have been unloved since the Brexit referendum. The pandemic has compounded investors' wariness. A decisive election result in December provided some respite. But the FTSE All-Share Index has still starkly underperformed other major indices since late February.
A shortage of buyers in any market is a magnet for private equity. There were competing buyout bids for Walmart Inc.'s sale of a majority stake in U.K. grocer Asda. Trustbusters had already vetoed a domestic merger. One of the failed bidders, Apollo Global Management Inc., was simultaneously trying to buy listed bookmaker William Hill Plc, which has since agreed to a takeover by joint venture partner Caesars Entertainment Inc.
There's a perception British takeover regulations hamper so-called take-private deals. Reforms were introduced in 2011 following Cadbury's controversial purchase by what's now Mondelez International Inc. Any leak of an approach requires the target to name the suitor, who must then formalize an offer within 28 days or walk away.
Private equity firms don't like the idea that their tentative prospects could be made public given so many talks fail. The timetable is also tight for negotiating a price, conducting due diligence and securing financing. Meanwhile, hostile deals made over the heads of managers face due diligence snags and undermine buyout firms' attempts to market themselves as a friendly corporate partner.
So the theory goes. In fact, deal activity held up after the rule changes, and there were several big U.K. take-private deals in defense engineering, satellites and theme parks in the year preceding the pandemic. Sterling's weakness has helped and bidders know it may not last.
Now, if anything, private equity is getting more aggressive. GardaWorld's hostile bid for rival security firm G4S Plc is backed by cash from 51%-owner BC Partners. True, it's less risky for BC to support a portfolio company in a hostile takeover than to pick a fight on its own. Its Canadian partner knows the industry well, and any future problems with G4S would be shared. That's safer than a leveraged buyout of just G4S without due diligence.
The confrontational tactics may help flush out the price at which G4S's investors and the board will roll over. But they risk setting the tone for any future deals attempted by BC. Evidently, the firm is comfortable with that.
These are particularly fraught times for U.K. companies to be on the receiving end of a takeover. Executives' instinct will be to argue their firm's standalone value is much higher than its current share price implies. For the average stock, a conventional one-third takeover premium would only match the pre-Covid high — a level most boards would have thought was already depressed due to Brexit. But it may be where private and public equity investors are able to meet.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Chris Hughes is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering deals. He previously worked for Reuters Breakingviews, as well as the Financial Times and the Independent newspaper.
©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.