Dividend Distribution Tax Rationalisation The Need Of The Hour
The government's vision of making India a $5-trillion economy by 2024-25 appears to be challenging. To achieve the target, the government recently reduced the corporate tax rates cut and partially withdrew the enhanced surcharge to attract more foreign investments and to provide more funds with companies for reinvestment.
Abolishment of dividend distribution tax (DDT) has been in the news lately. Tax experts think that DDT is one of the significant hurdles in enriching the Indian corporate economy and it should be replaced with a progressive system of taxation.
The Finance Act, 1997 introduced the concept of DDT to levy an additional tax on the domestic companies distributing profits to the shareholders. Before this, dividend income was taxable in the hands of the shareholders. Though the structure of DDT is methodical and premeditated, yet it has a few shortcomings for the investors and companies paying such tax.
Multiple tax collection from the same source of income keeps the investors at bay. The companies pay the dividend out of profit remaining after tax. Thus, companies first pay tax on the profits earned by it, and then they pay additional tax on the profit distributed as dividend. Lastly, tax is also paid by the domestic shareholders if the aggregate amount of dividend received by them exceeds Rs 10 lakh. As a result, DDT brings in the cascading effect of taxation.
In the current regime, the companies pay the dividend distribution tax at the flat rate, notwithstanding the tax rates applicable to the shareholder. Thus, a shareholder who is otherwise liable for lower tax rate is paying higher taxes in the form of DDT. On the other hand, a shareholder who is otherwise liable to pay tax at a higher rate is actually paying tax lower taxes. If the government decides to abolish DDT, the dividend income would be taxable in the hands of shareholders as per the slab rates applicable to them.
The idea behind bringing DDT was to tax dividend income at the company level so that there could be zero revenue loss. Even after abolishing the DDT, the government can ensure zero revenue loss if the deduction of tax from the amount of dividend is made mandatory without any threshold limit. Companies should be liable to pay TDS at the flat rate, and the remaining amount of tax can be collected from the shareholders. The government follows a similar approach on interest income on which tax is deducted under Section 194A.
Considering the current state of the economy, rationalisation of DDT is the need of the hour. This decision can infuse positive sentiments as companies will have more funds for reinvestment. Foreign companies will pay lesser taxes on the dividend as most of the double taxation treaties prescribe the tax rate of 10 per cent on dividend income. Further, the foreign companies will be able to claim the foreign tax credit of taxes so paid in India.
This move not only avoids the ongoing cascading effect on dividend distribution but would also give monetary benefits to both the shareholder and the Income Tax Department. If a company allocates the same distributable profit for declaration of dividend, the shareholders will now receive more dividend income. In other words, that portion of distributable profit which was utilized for payment of DDT (till financial year 2019-20) will now be distributed among shareholders. Thus, more dividend income shall be paid to the shareholders. Shareholders falling lower tax brackets pay lesser taxes on dividend income, whereas those in higher tax brackets lead to more revenue for the tax department. Let's understand how.
| Shareholder | Applicable tax rate | Financial Year 2019-20 | Financial Year 2020-21 | Net benefit/Loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend received after DDT @ 20.55% | Dividend Received* | Tax on dividend | Net inflow from dividend | |||
| Mr. A | 5.20% | 1,00,000 | 1,20,555 | 6,269 | 1,14,286 | 14,286 |
| Mr. B | 20.80% | 1,00,000 | 1,20,555 | 25,076 | 95,480 | -4,520 |
| Mr. C | 31.20% | 1,00,000 | 1,20,555 | 37,613 | 82,942 | -17,058 |
| Mr. D | 34.94% | 1,00,000 | 1,20,555 | 42,127 | 78,428 | -21,572 |
(*Assuming that the portion of distributable profit which was utilized for payment of DDT (till FY20) will be distributed among shareholders. Thus, more dividend income will be paid to the shareholders. If other conditions remain the same, the same shareholder would now get a dividend of Rs. 1,20,556 viz-a-viz Rs. 1,00,000.)
The task force constituted to draft new direct tax laws has also suggested the abolishment of dividend distribution tax (DDT) in its report which was submitted to the Finance Ministry in August 2019. It has been recommended that instead of levying DDT on companies, the tax should be levied in the hands of shareholders. The task force claims that this step will provide an enormous boost to foreign direct investment (FDI).
(Naveen Wadhwa is Deputy General Manager and Shivi Agarwal is Assistant Manager at Taxmann.com)
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. The facts and opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of NDTV and NDTV does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.
-
Indians Are Travelling, But Not Every Journey Is A Holiday | The Week In Whys
Pilgrims, patients and working women are the real travellers, and the system hasn't quite caught up with them.
-
Getting To Work Costs Women More | The Reason Why
It is not just about women paying more than men. It is about women paying much more in cities than in villages.
-
AI Bias In Investing Cannot Be Eliminated, But It Can Be Governed
Framing is a particularly important example as identical financial information presented in terms of gains rather than losses can lead an LLM to reach a different assessment.
-
Joining The Dots | Dark Skies, Steady Diya: Why Hope Holds This Diwali
With war, a weak rupee and foreign outflows weighing on sentiment, policymakers at the NDTV World Summit and market veterans at NDTV Profit Ignite: Diwali Edition offered the same advice: stay invested and filter out the noise.
-
The Curious Case of Equitas Small Finance Bank And A CEO Who Quit For Stock
PN Vasudevan believes persistent investor concerns over a perceived conflict of interest had become a governance overhang on Equitas Small Finance Bank's stock, even as the lender improved profitability and asset quality.
-
Talking Points This Week: AI Cash Burn, A Tiger Comeback And An India That Still Finds Its Own Path
India is not immune to higher oil or tighter global liquidity, yet its earnings base is broader, its domestic policy levers are still available.
-
Foreign Investors Own Half Of HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank. An LTCG Cut Could Matter Most Here
Foreign portfolio investors have US$115 billion parked in HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank. If the government cuts long-term capital gains tax, Jefferies says returning foreign money could land here first.
-
'Never Seen This Level Of Negativity': Sandeep Tandon Says The Next Rally May Be Closer Than You Think
Veteran investor Sandeep Tandon says foreign selling is easing, large-caps are due a comeback and mid-caps are crowded, while he turns positive on gold, power and pharma this Diwali.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.