Bristol-Myers Reunites With Cancer Drug That Got Away
(Bloomberg) -- In this global game of pharmaceutical hot potato, Bristol-Myers Squibb could be happy it got it back.
Nine years ago, Medarex -- which Bristol-Myers acquired a couple of years later for $2.4 billion -- sent a drug called HuMax-IL8 to Danish biotech Genmab. In 2012, Genmab passed that drug to a small Swedish biotech, Cormorant Pharmaceuticals. Now Bristol-Myers is bringing the drug back home, announcing Tuesday that it will pay up to $520 million for Cormorant.Â
The deal may add to the company's blockbuster portfolio of cancer drugs that bolster the immune system, acquired from Medarex in the first place and expected to pass $10 billion in annual sales by 2020. Plus any downside is relatively limited. Bristol-Myers is paying only $95 million up front and in near-term milestone payments; the rest comes if the drug hits longer-term milestones.Â
Bristol-Myers is in good shape for deals. It had nearly $8 billion in cash on hand as of its last filing and has a relatively modest 1.34 total debt to adjusted Ebitda ratio compared with an average of 1.74 for its peers. And it's not desperate for a deal that will pay off in the near term. Analysts expect Bristol-Myers will have large pharma-leading sales growth of 10.4 percent a year from 2016 to 2019, driven in large part by its lead cancer drug, Opdivo.Â
The Cormorant deal is definitely for the long term. Its early stage trial for HuMax-IL8 in solid tumors is still recruiting patients, according to ClinicalTrials.gov. But the real potential, according to Bristol-Myers, is in the possibility that the drug can boost other immune-system enhancing cancer treatments.Â
First-generation immunotherapy drugs like Opdivo can be extremely effective. But they only work in a limited number of patients and cancers. The hope is that combinations with other drugs will make them more useful broadly.Â
Bristol-Myers has a big head start in immunotherapy. Analysts expect Opdivo to outsell its closest competitor by $1.8 billion this year. It's also ahead in combinations; Opdivo and an earlier Bristol-Myers drug called Yervoy remain the only such drugs to be approved as a duo so far.Â
This deal is part of its bid to maintain its dominance as many more types of double and triple drug combinations are tested. Bristol-Myers has a number of other early stage immunotherapy candidates, and this adds yet another distinct approach.Â
Having a broad spectrum of internally owned assets is just good economics. Owning a backbone drug like Opdivo plus others that add to its effectiveness could increase both sales and pricing power. Payers are more likely to buy a wholly owned discounted combination than pay full price to different companies for each drug. There's likely to be a big advantage for companies with broad portfolios.
Some might see the drug's long development history as a negative, and Medarex did let it go. But it did so when cancer immunotherapies, let alone combinations of them, were still a distant hope. Moreover, Bristol-Myers has people that are most likely familiar with this drug and can nurture its development.
The last time Bristol bet on Medarex, it paid off big time. It's nice to have one of its drugs that slipped away back in the fold.Â
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.
To contact the author of this story: Max Nisen in New York at mnisen@bloomberg.net.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Daniel Niemi at dniemi1@bloomberg.net.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.
-
France's Economy & Politics Are In Crisis | The Reason Why
Let's look at how the French economy and politics evolved under Nicolas Sarkozy, Franois Hollande and Emmanuel Macron.
-
You May Inherit The Business. You Must Earn Its Credibility.
Succession tests the founder's ability to share authority as much as it tests the next generation's readiness to assume it.
-
Signing Deals Is One Thing; Making Them Work Is Another | The Week In Whys
Sometimes, things don't turn out as planned. Indian companies have lost some bids to rivals, some projects won't produce until 2030.
-
FOMC Wall, PERM Suspension, Hospital Stocks | Talking Points This Week
A PERM suspension would directly affect green-card sponsorship rather than H-1B visas, so the near-term earnings impact could remain relatively limited. The key question is whether this marks a new phase in US scrutiny of Indian IT.
-
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once: Dalal Street's Week To Forget | Joining The Dots
Visa curbs, a Starlink spat and cancer drug caps: what connects this week's shocks for Indian markets
-
India Is Going Abroad For Critical Minerals. But It May Take Years To Pay Off | The Reason Why
Although India's steps are in the right direction, they remain modest compared with India's growing dependence.
-
When Everyone Has AI, What Gives You An Edge?
India's young workforce is entering an uncertain world of work where powerful AI tools are becoming widely accessible. The advantage will belong to those who combine deep expertise with digital fluency, and the distinctly human capabilities that technology cannot manufacture.