Boeing Goes on the Defensive With Embraer Deal
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Boeing Co. has learned the value of the axiom “If you can't beat them, join them.”
The $194 billion company on Thursday announced preliminary terms for a commercial aircraft joint venture with Brazilian regional-jet maker Embraer SA. Boeing bills the partnership as an “evolution” of years of collaboration between the companies on research and the KC-390 military cargo plane. I'm sure it's just a coincidence that Boeing decided to more formally crystalize the companies' relationship after rival Airbus SE took a majority stake in Bombardier Inc.'s C-series program and put a spotlight on the regional-jet hole in Boeing's lineup.
Embraer will retain its private-plane and military units, a structure that appears aimed at appeasing Brazilian regulators who had the power to reject a deal and view the planemaker as a national industrial champion. The joint venture with Boeing values Embraer's commercial aircraft operations at $4.75 billion, more than the entire company's market value at the end of last week. Embraer's stock drop on Thursday suggests its holders were still expecting more. Rightly so: Commercial aircraft made up almost 60 percent of Embraer's revenue last year, but it was the only division to have positive operating income in that time frame.
That said, it's a good outcome for Embraer, which would have struggled to compete against the scale and marketing reach of a combined Airbus-Bombardier on its own. Boeing is expected to pay cash for its stake, according to Reuters. It's a fine enough deal for the planemaker, but it comes across as a defensive maneuver. Recall that not that long ago, Boeing was dismissive of the small aircraft market, saying the profit dynamics weren't “terribly attractive.” It also turned its nose up at the Airbus-Bombardier tie-up, calling it “questionable.” And yet now it wants shareholders to view the Embraer transaction differently.
The irony is that Boeing itself set in motion the chain of events that required it to have a toehold in regional jets. It accused Bombardier of using Canadian subsidies to unfairly compete for a Delta Air Lines Inc. contract, despite the fact that Boeing wasn't a legitimate contender for that deal in the first place, as illustrated by its need to gain control of Embraer's regional-jet lineup. It persuaded the U.S. Department of Commerce to slap hefty tariffs on Bombardier. Those were eventually rescinded by the International Trade Commission, but in the meantime, Boeing's bullying pushed Bombardier into Airbus's open arms. Airbus paid nothing upfront for its stake in a C-series program that now looks a lot more lucrative with less fettered access to U.S. markets.
Boeing says the Embraer transaction will not affect its 2018 financial guidance, capital deployment strategy or commitment to return roughly 100 percent of its free cash flow to shareholders. That will be a key point for investors. Even so, this deal takes Boeing in a different direction from the one shareholders had counted on, and it should be a bit jarring that the company would reverse course to prioritize a market it so recently looked down upon.
The Embraer transaction doesn't do that much for Boeing's goal of building a $50 billion business focused on higher-margin sales of parts and after-market services. Perhaps the biggest benefit on this front is Embraer's lower-cost manufacturing capabilities, which Boeing could take advantage of as it brings more parts work in-house, notes Canaccord Genuity analyst Ken Herbert. That's an interesting value proposition for a company that earned a “God Bless Boeing” acclaim from President Donald Trump about a year ago for its American manufacturing and hiring efforts.
Boeing shares were essentially flat on news of the Embraer deal. That most likely reflects some relief that the ultimate cash outlay wasn't higher, but also a realization that this deal is more defensive than offensive.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Daniel Niemi at dniemi1@bloomberg.net
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.