These People Pay the Most Overdraft Fees
(Bloomberg) -- Perhaps the most despised bank fee among consumers is the overdraft fee, an ugly $30 (or so) insult to your wallet. Many consumers have been hit with it at one time or another, usually when it's the absolute last thing they need. The depth of consumer disgust for such a high fee is, alas, equally matched by the abiding love banks, thrifts, and credit unions have for the billions of dollars in annual revenue they provide.
Overdraft services began decades ago as a simple service for customers without calculators: If you didn't have enough money to cover a check, your bank saved you from bouncing it. But we're talking banks, here, so nothing is for free. A new report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau shows just how much of a bite (PDF) overdraft fees can take out of some consumers, and provides new prototype disclosure forms (PDF) it hopes banks and credit unions will adopt. The CFPB examined overdraft fees on debit cards and ATM withdrawals for people who frequently find themselves overdrawn on their checking accounts. Among those who paid 10 overdraft or non-sufficient fund (NSF) fees a year, those who opted into a bank's overdraft service paid as much as $450 more in fees than those who had similar behavior but who didn't opt in to overdraft coverage.
Consumers that had more than 10 overdrafts or NSFs in a year make up nine percent of the 40 million accounts the CFPB studied at a small number of large banks, but they paid 79 percent of the banks' total overdraft and NSF fees. Of that universe, those who opted into an overdraft service typically paid 18 fees a year for a total of $612. Frequent overdrafters who didn't opt in typically paid five fees a year for a total of $170. A 2014 Pew Charitable Trusts study found that in 2013 “10 percent of Americans paid at least one overdraft penalty, and another 5 percent paid an overdraft transfer fee.”
What makes this all particularly perverse is that the CFPB estimated in previous studies that most debit card transactions leading to overdrafts are $24 or less. That small overdraft, however, can lead to a cascade of big fees if the consumer doesn't catch it, and thus continues to use the card as usual or doesn't pause automatic payments for cable, power, and the gym.
Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, a Democrat, has inquired of banks for information on their overdraft programs, and several class actions against credit unions, which depend heavily on theses fees, have been filed in recent years. Nevertheless, it's become a bit easier to avoid overdraft fees in recent years. A regulatory change that became effective in 2010 requires that, for banks to charge you an overdraft fee on a debit card purchase or ATM withdrawal, you first have to opt-in to its overdraft service. If a consumer doesn't opt in to the service, which costs nothing until it kicks into action, their transaction can simply be refused because they don't have enough money in the account. The regulation doesn't apply to checks or scheduled online bill-payments, though, which is why one overdraft can cascade into a string of fees if automatic payments aren't halted.
Fintech companies, meanwhile, are popping up with mobile phone money management apps to help millennials avoid overdraft fees. One such company is named Dave—which has Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban as lead investor—and tracks, analyzes, and predicts users' balances and lets them borrow up to $75, interest-free, until the next payday to prevent an overdraft fee. The company sees helping with overdrafts as a way into a bigger banking relationship with its users, who tend to be between 18 and 34. A U.K. startup called Chip is a chatbot also focused on helping British millennial users avoid overdraft charges through its savings algorithm. The company has plans for a feature called “Smart Credit” that will automatically provide a small loan (not for free but less than an overdraft would cost) when it sees a customer is about to go into overdraft.
Many consumers agree to overdraft services without being entirely clear what they're signing up for—or just forgetting they agreed to it. The 2014 Pew report found that 52 percent of people who overdrew their account and got a fee didn't recall opting into the coverage. The benefit, of course, is that the bill your paying gets paid or the purchase you're making rings through. The cost, of course, is the fee.
Overdraft fees on checking accounts have risen since the recession and are the leading fee category in all non-interest income, said Michael Moebs of Moebs Services Inc., an economic research firm. He thinks fees could produce $40 billion in annual revenue across banks, thrifts, and credit unions by 2020. In For the first quarter of 2017, bank and credit union revenue from overdraft fees, including those on bounced checks, was $8.4 billion, which translates into $33.6 billion on an annual basis, he said.
Pew has urged regulators to make changes including enabling “banks and credit unions to offer affordable small-dollar loans in place of expensive overdraft penalty programs” and to “make overdraft penalty fees reasonable and proportional either to the financial institution's costs in providing the overdraft loan or to the overdraft amount.”
Virginia O'Neill, senior vice president of the American Bankers Association, said in a statement that the lobbying group will work "with the bureau to test the proposed new disclosures to make sure they improve consumer understanding.”
Don't expect much regulatory action out of the CFPB on the overdraft front soon, though. In a prepared statement introducing the new report, CFPB director Richard Cordray said that, “We are not proposing any regulatory amendments at this time, though we are considering new overdraft regulations, and currently we are in the ‘pre-rule stage' with no timing stated for when a rule may be proposed.” If Cordray is to lead the charge, he has about a year—his term expires in July, 2018, though at least one adviser to President Donald Trump has suggested an earlier departure.
Have personal finance questions or lessons to share? Join Money Talks, the new Facebook community from Bloomberg News.
To contact the editor responsible for this story: David Rovella at drovella@bloomberg.net.
-
Indians Stay With Family, Not In Hotels | The Reason Why
India still lacks enough clean, reliable and affordable hotels for budget-conscious travellers.
-
The Economic Imperative: Analysing The Material Driving Force Behind India-Canada Strategic Reset
This economic complementarity is further reinforced by deep institutional investment ties and talent mobility, which form the bedrock of the bilateral framework.
-
Medicine Pricing: Where Must Profit Stop?
India must confront excessive margins, hidden incentives and regulatory gaps that threaten the integrity of medicine.
-
Why Amazon And Flipkart Are Struggling To Beat Meesho In India's Smaller Cities
With 274 million users and lowest-cost logistics, Meesho is defending its value commerce crown against giants like Amazon and Flipkart.
-
High US Salaries, No Green Card Certainty: The Financial Calculation Facing Indian H-1B Families
The suspension of PERM processing at eight technology employers does not cancel existing H-1B visas. What it does is force a question many Indian families have been avoiding: is the US salary worth tying your career and family plans to one employer?
-
Swiggy vs Eternal: Food Delivery's Two Rivals Are No Longer In The Same Race
Eternal is building a private AI assistant, dark.ai. Swiggy is still working out how to make Instamart pay, with an operating loss of Rs 895 crore in the July-September quarter while Blinkit stayed profitable.
-
Where You Live Shapes How You Get To Work | The Reason Why
Two-wheelers are the most popular way to get to work in India, accounting for nearly 43% of workplace commutes.
-
Unhedged Position: Can India See An Indonesia-Style Time Correction?
The Nifty is trading below levels it first clocked in 2024. Is there, then, as I have suggested in the headline, potential that the current time correction drags on painfully for the next three-five, even ten years?
-
Navigating Friction And Energy Realities: An Analysis Of Marco Rubio's October Visit To India
Occurring at a critical juncture marked by stalled trade negotiations and escalating geopolitical pressures over global energy supplies, the visit offers a profound window into modern US-India relations.
-
India Exports Capital. Why Not Export Trusteeship?
The big question, then, is whether India can build an institution that global borrowers, investors, banks, and lawyers can trust, even without an Indian connection.