A section of industry stakeholders have pitched for "zero-for-zero" levies as an alternative at a time India looks to hammer out a bilateral trade agreement with the United States amid a looming threat of tariffs.
Among those who have backed this approach are Global Trade Research Initiative and the Confederation of Indian Textile Industry, which underscored that elimination of tariffs on a targeted line of products would be beneficial for India instead of entering into a broad trade pact with the US.
Zero-for-zero tariffs can allow India to maintain the competitiveness of its exports to the American market, while protecting sensitive sectors like agriculture and automobile from ramped-up US imports, they pointed out.
Here's a look at what is the strategy behind the zero-for-zero approach, and how it can blunt the impact of reciprocal tariffs threatened by US President Donald Trump.
How Zero-For-Zero Tariff Works
Zero-for-zero tariff is an approach where two countries can identify specific product categories and eliminate the levies on them, instead of imposing a blanket range of tariffs or inking a broader trade deal.
The GTRI, the Indian think-tank that has been pushing for the zero-for-zero approach since last month, said around 90% of industrial goods currently traded between India and the US could be covered under such an arrangement.
India held a trade surplus of around $46 billion with the US in 2024, as per the US Census Bureau data. Since the balance of trade is leaned in favour of India, a zero-for-zero approach will make the country the net beneficiary, as per the proponents of this strategy.
However, for such an arrangement to work, both India and the US will have to agree on the specific product lines or sectors on which tariffs can be eliminated.
Why Zero-For-Zero Is Preferred Over BTA
The zero-for-zero approach is mooted as a macro-level trading arrangement, which can be brought into effect within a span of a few days as compared to a bilateral trade agreement that will require several months to be hammered out.
India and the US plan to hold deliberations till at least September before arriving at the BTA. Taking cue from India's trade-pact negotiations with the European Union and the United Kingdom, it can be assumed that there is a high probability of talks getting prolonged.
The Trump administration has hinted at no reprieve for India from reciprocal tariffs during the negotiation period, with the president reiterating on multiple occasions that he plans to slap the reciprocal tariffs on a number of countries, including India, from April.
The GTRI, along with the CITI, believe that a zero-for-zero approach could help India blunt the impact of reciprocal tariffs.
If 90% of the traded industrial goods, excluding sensitive sectors, can be brought under the ambit of a zero-for-zero arrangement, then the reciprocal tariffs on the remaining 10% of traded goods will not cause much impact on India, according to the GTRI.
To support its point, the think-tank pointed out on Saturday that India's annual passenger car exports to the US stands at around $13 million. Even if reciprocal tariffs are levied by the US on automobile imports, it would not have much impact on India due to the relatively low stakes involved.
The signing of the BTA may also leave the Indian automobile and agriculture industry vulnerable. The GTRI pointed towards the case of Australia, where the domestic car industry faced a collapse after the import tariffs were lowered to 5% from 45% in the late 1980s.
The US, via a trade pact, may also seek a foothold in the Indian food consumption market, which could adversely impact the estimated 70-crore people involved in the Indian agriculture industry, the think tank argued.
"Opening even a few agricultural products to the US imports could set a dangerous precedent, leading to increased pressure for further concessions," GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava told news agency PTI last week. "With India's total agriculture, dairy, and marine exports to the US amounting to just $5 billion, retaliatory US tariffs would not significantly harm India."
China Plus One
The textile industry, in particular, is excited by the prospects of zero tariffs with the China Plus One factor playing out. With the Trump administration already imposing 20% additional tariffs on China, Indian textile exports are expected to become more competitive. China Plus One refers to the business strategy to reduce reliance on China and diversify manufacturing into other markets.
The waiver of tariffs can increase US' textile and apparel imports to $16 billion from $10.8 billion at present. No major impact of reciprocal tariff is seen on India as US' textile exports to India stood at only $0.41 billion, according to CITI.
The Challenges
The US aims to expand its footprint in the Indian automobile and agriculture sectors. It may choose to put pressure on New Delhi to ink a bilateral trade pact, rather than averting a broader deal through a zero-for-zero approach.
The duties levied on luxurious cars and motorcycle imports from the US have often been referred to by Trump while attacking India over its tariff policy. Since his first term in the White House, Trump has been pushing for lower Indian duties on Harley-Davidson motorcycles.
Washington is also seeking increased access for its farm products in the Indian market, with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick saying last week that agriculture cannot be "off the table" during the trade negotiations with India.
What also indicated the Trump regime's potential disinterest in a zero-for-zero approach was Lutnick saying that the US and India should enter into a grand trade pact, rather than a "product-by-product" arrangement.
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

India-US Make Final Push For Trade Deal As Tariff Pause Deadline Nears, But Obstacles Remain


Brace For Impact, The Most Volatile Month Ahead: Open Interest


Trump Says Again He’ll Set Unilateral Tariffs In Two Weeks


Trump’s China Gambit Belies Rocky Road Ahead On Tariff Deals
