President Donald Trump's administration urged the US Supreme Court to turn away a request for fast-track review of his sweeping tariffs, saying the justices should give lower courts more time to weigh in.
The filing comes a day after two family-owned businesses asked the court to hear their challenge on an unusually quick schedule, without waiting for a federal appeals court to rule. The companies suggested the justices decide before their summer recess starts in about two weeks whether to hear the case.
-
Indian Markets Turning Corner After Two Tough Years, Says Sandeep Tandon -
NDTV Profit Ignite 2026: Experts See Opportunity In Equities, Stay Bullish For Long-Term -
Buy Right, Sit Tight Does Not Work for Individual Stocks, Says Dinshaw Irani -
'Worst Is Behind': Quant MF Sees Market Bottom, Flags 'Extreme Euphoria' In Midcaps -
India's Mutual Fund Industry Could Become A $1 Trillion Opportunity, Say Fund Managers -
'Foreign Investors Are Baraatis': Raamdeo Agrawal's Take On LTCG Tax -
Stay Invested Through Market Cycles: Raamdeo Agrawal at NDTV Profit Ignite -
Ramesh Damani Remains Bullish On India For Next 20-30 Years, Sees Bargains Amid Market Weakness -
CAS Came After A Long Consultation Process: SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey AT NDTV PROFIT IGNITE -
Aim To Cut FPI Onboarding Time From Mth To Five Days: SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey AT NDTV PROFI
In a seven-page response Wednesday, US Solicitor General D. John Sauer said the companies “have not justified such a stark departure from established practice.”
The request by educational-toy makers Learning Resources Inc. and hand2mind Inc. put Trump's tariffs, which have worldwide economic implications, before the justices for the first time. A federal district judge agreed with the companies that Trump lacked authority under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to issue the import taxes.
A federal appeals court in a separate case has said the tariffs could stay in effect at least until that panel hears arguments July 31. In the new filing, the Trump administration said the Supreme Court should let that court hold arguments and rule before getting involved.
Both court clashes cover Trump's April 2 “Liberation Day” tariffs — which combine a universal baseline levy of 10% with potentially much bigger rates for various trading partners. Each suit also concerns at least some of Trump's separate import taxes over fentanyl trafficking.
The case is Learning Resources v. Trump, 24-1287.
Essential Business Intelligence, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice, Daily Fuel, Gold and Silver Prices and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.