Global consultancy Deloitte has agreed to partially refund its $440,000 fee to the Australian government after admitting to the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in preparing "Future Made in Australia" an official report— a move that later led to several factual errors and fabricated references.
The report, commissioned in 2024 by the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations, was part of a review into the government’s Future Made in Australia initiative, reported Guardian. It assessed the department’s compliance framework and IT system, which automatically issues penalties to job seekers failing to meet their mutual obligation requirements.
When the report was released in July, it was soon discovered to contain multiple inaccuracies — including citations of non-existent academics and even a fabricated quote attributed to a Federal Court judgment, as reported by The Australian Financial Review. Following the revelations, the department published a corrected version of the report, removing more than a dozen false references and footnotes, updating its bibliography, and fixing numerous typographical errors.
The errors were first flagged by Dr Christopher Rudge, an Australian welfare academic, who described the inaccuracies as classic examples of AI “hallucinations” — a phenomenon in which AI tools generate false or misleading information to fill in knowledge gaps. “Rather than replacing a single fake reference with a real one, they’ve removed the hallucinated citations and added multiple legitimate sources in their place,” Rudge explained, suggesting that parts of the report were not properly evidence-based.
Deloitte admitted to using AI during the early drafting stages, specifically a large language model (Azure OpenAI GPT-4o), but maintained that the tool did not influence the report’s “substantive content, findings or recommendations.” The firm said the report was subsequently “reviewed and refined by human experts,” and the use of AI was disclosed in the updated version.
A Deloitte spokesperson confirmed “the matter has been resolved directly with the client,” while the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations stated that the refund process is underway, according to NDTV. Officials also indicated that future consultancy contracts may impose stricter guidelines on the use of AI-generated material.
The episode has reignited debate over the ethical and professional responsibilities tied to AI-assisted work in high-value consultancy projects. As firms increasingly integrate AI to enhance productivity, questions persist over the transparency, accuracy, and value of such work.
Ironically, the controversy comes shortly after Deloitte announced a global partnership with Anthropic, granting its nearly 500,000 employees access to the Claude AI platform — underscoring how deeply artificial intelligence is now embedded in the professional services landscape.
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Kota: NEET Aspirant Found Hanging In PG Room, Family Alleges Foul Play


Dark Patterns Such As Hidden Fees, Drip Pricing Used By Bulk Of Online Platforms: LocalCircles


Air India Crash: SC Calls Mention Of Alleged Pilot Error In Leaked Probe Report 'Unfortunate'


Akasa Air To Fly From Bengaluru To Phuket, Thailand From Oct. 1
