ADVERTISEMENT

Decade-Old RIL-ONGC Gas Migration Dispute To Reach 'Logical End' After $2.81-Billion Compensation Demand

In 2013, Oil & Natural Gas Corp. brought up the issue of natural gas from its blocks allegedly seeping into Reliance Industries' KG-D6 block.

<div class="paragraphs"><p>A decade-long dispute between Reliance Industries Ltd. and the Union government over gas migration to its KG-D6 block from Oil &amp; Natural Gas Corp.'s blocks is finally reaching its logical end (Image:&nbsp;RIL website)</p></div>
A decade-long dispute between Reliance Industries Ltd. and the Union government over gas migration to its KG-D6 block from Oil & Natural Gas Corp.'s blocks is finally reaching its logical end (Image: RIL website)

A decade-long dispute between Reliance Industries Ltd. and the Union government over gas migration to the company's KG-D6 block from those of Oil & Natural Gas Corp. is finally reaching its "logical end".

The government has demanded a whopping $2.81 billion from RIL and its consortium partners, increasing the stakes in this high-profile case, with the company now planning to challenge the decision in the Supreme Court, according to an exchange filing on Tuesday.

In 2013, ONGC brought up the issue of natural gas from its blocks allegedly seeping into RIL's KG-D6 block. A former ONGC official aware of the matter claimed that RIL was aware of the gas migration and was liable to pay for the gas it consumed.

It is a matter of liability. RIL has the constitutional right to explore legal options, but they cannot deny the fact that they consumed gas that did not belong to them, the official said on the condition of anonymity.

"RIL is likely to take the matter to the Supreme Court following a similar template they used during international arbitration," Deven Choksey, managing director of DR Choksey Finservm said.

Controlling the flow of natural gas in offshore conditions is extremely difficult and a decade-long matter will reach its "logical end", according to Choksey.

"This is a complex issue and it's not unusual for disputes like this to arise in fields with interconnected geological formations," Anish De, global head of energy at KPMG, said. "In such cases, oil and gas naturally flow between designated field boundaries."

A typical example is of Qatar and Iran, which share such connected reservoirs between North Field of Qatar and South Pars of Iran. "It becomes challenging and difficult to limit flows or conclusively establish any wrongful extraction in such instances," De added.

However, there is a possibility of the two companies arriving at a mutually agreed settlement over the matter. The arbitral award earlier was against a demand of $1.55 billion that has now increased to $2.81 billion, which may get reduced under a settlement. Taking the issue to the Supreme Court will further delay the matter, according to a consultant with an international consultancy firm who also spoke on the condition of anonymity.

RIL's stock has been under pressure over the last couple of months and has declined over 23% in the last one year. The stock has already priced in the negative news from February, but the possibility of a settlement remains, according to an analyst who did not want to be quoted.

As the matter heads to the Supreme Court, all eyes are on the outcome of this decade-long dispute.

Opinion
India's $2 Trillion Exports Target 'Daunting' In Face Of US, EU Trade Policies, Says DGFT

History

  • The dispute dates back to 2013 when ONGC suspected that RIL's KG-D6 block was draining gas from its adjacent blocks.

  • ONGC was asked to sidestep as it had no ownership rights on the property as it belonged to the government.

  • In 2016, the government sought $1.55 billion from RIL and its partners for the quantum of gas that had migrated to its block KG-D6.

  • RIL contested the claims before an arbitral tribunal, which upheld in July 2018 that it was not obliged to pay any compensation.

  • The government filed an appeal and a single judge of the Delhi High Court upheld the arbitration award in May 2023, dismissing the appeal.

  • In February, a division bench of the high court set aside the single judge order, ruling against RIL and its partners.

  • The government demanded $2.81 billion in compensation from RIL

  • Reliance plans to challenge the judgment in the Supreme Court, stating that the demand is "unsustainable" and that they don't expect any liability on this account.

Watch

Opinion
Bharat Forge To UPL — A Guide To Indian Stocks Under Trump's Tariff Thunder
OUR NEWSLETTERS
By signing up you agree to the Terms & Conditions of NDTV Profit