A widening rift appears to be emerging within the Trump administration over the handling and messaging of the ongoing West Asia conflict, with sharp questions being raised about whether War Secretary Pete Hegseth is accurately briefing President Donald Trump.
According to a senior administration official quoted by The Washington Post, concerns have surfaced that Hegseth's public and internal assessments of the war may be overly optimistic, potentially misinforming both the public and the president.
“Pete is not speaking truth to the president,” the official said, adding, “As a result, the president is out there repeating misleading information.”
Doubts intensified after Iran reportedly downed a US F-15E fighter jet using a shoulder-fired missile, contradicting repeated assertions of “complete control of Iranian skies” and “uncontested space.”
The incident triggered a high-risk recovery operation and underscored Tehran's continued ability to threaten US military assets.
Despite this, Trump downplayed the episode, saying, “He got lucky. It was a lucky hit.”
Hegseth has outlined key war objectives to the president, including dismantling Iran's missile arsenal, destroying its naval capabilities, eliminating proxy networks, and ensuring Tehran never acquires a nuclear weapon.
However, officials have disputed some of his claims—particularly that US operations have “overwhelmingly destroyed” Iran's missile and drone programmes—saying a significant portion of launchers and attack drones remain intact.
His assertion that Iran has “no air defences” has also come under scrutiny in light of the F-15 incident.
Military analyst Kelly Grieco of the Stimson Center said such incidents highlight the difference between air superiority and full air supremacy.
“Our air superiority is limited geographically to the west and to the south, but also in terms of altitude,” she reportedly said, explaining that US aircraft may be operating at higher altitudes to avoid shoulder-fired threats.
Further discrepancies have also emerged in Hegseth's battlefield assessments.
He had claimed that Iranian missile and drone launches dropped to their lowest levels following sustained US and Israeli strikes.
However, internal documents cited by officials indicate that lower activity periods had occurred earlier in March. “Documents sent around internally contradict Hegseth's claims,” an official said, according to the WSJ report.
Another official reportedly criticised the broader approach to measuring Iran's military strength, arguing that focusing on launch numbers alone is misguided. “If you judge Iran's strength or weakness based on their launch numbers, that is a dumb metric. What is their objective? Are they achieving that? That's what matters.”
Essential Business Intelligence, Continuous LIVE TV, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.