- HDFC Bank and top executives face US class action for alleged interest payout scheme
- Lawsuit claims HDFC disguised $4.7M interest as marketing expenses to MSRDC
- HDFC promised MSRDC 6.01% interest, exceeding standard 3.5% savings rate illegally
HDFC Bank Ltd. and its top executives are facing a federal securities class action lawsuit in New York, following explosive allegations that the Indian banking giant orchestrated a covert scheme to illegally inflate interest payouts to a state government agency by disguising them as marketing expenses.
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by investor Jwalant Natvarlal Soneji, targets the Mumbai-headquartered bank along with Chief Executive Officer Sashidhar Jagdishan and Chief Financial Officer Srinivasan Vaidyanathan. The lawsuit is brought on behalf of all investors who purchased HDFC's American Depositary Shares (ADS) between July 17, 2023, and May 26, 2026.
After the details emerged, the American Depository Receipts of HDFC Bank fell nearly 1% in the US. The ADRs were trading 0.87% lower at 23.43 at 9:55 pm IST.
At the heart of the litigation is an alleged arrangement designed to woo lucrative deposits from the Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC). According to the filing, HDFC promised the state infrastructure firm a 6.01% interest rate on its deposits—a massive 2.51% markup over the standard 3.5% savings rate offered to regular customers.
Because banking regulations explicitly forbid offering negotiated returns to individual depositors, senior management allegedly devised a workaround. The lawsuit claims that between 2023 and 2025, HDFC routed approximately 45 crore rupees ($4.7 million USD) in differential interest to the state firm. Instead of being credited as interest, these funds were allegedly "camouflaged" as marketing spend to sponsor a road safety awareness campaign run by MSRDC, flowing through third-party vendors.
ALSO READ: HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, Axis Bank: Bernstein's Top Bank Picks As Private Bank Recovery Gathers Pace
An internal vigilance probe reportedly concluded that this maneuver violated the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) Master Directions, as well as HDFC's internal anti-bribery policies prohibiting "improper inducement".
Consequently, the plaintiffs argue that HDFC's SEC filings throughout the class period were materially false. In its Form 20-F annual reports for fiscal years 2024 and 2025, HDFC management assured investors that its "internal control over financial reporting was effective". The complaint alleges that by burying the interest markup in the marketing budget, HDFC artificially overstated both its operating expenses and its highly scrutinized net interest income.
While the bank's filings routinely warned that "significant fraud, system failure or calamities would disrupt our revenue-generating activities" and acknowledged past RBI penalties, the complaint suggests these generic warnings failed to disclose the active, high-level deception allegedly taking place internally.
The alleged facade began to crack on March 18, 2026, when HDFC's Chairman, Atanu Chakraborty, abruptly resigned. In his resignation letter, Chakraborty cited “certain happenings and practices within the bank... that are not in congruence with my personal Values and Ethics”. The sudden departure spooked investors, sending HDFC's U.S.-traded shares tumbling 7.28% to close at $26.62 on unusually heavy trading volume.
The full scope of the fallout materialized on May 27, 2026, when The Indian Express published an exposé detailing the internal probe into the MSRDC payments. The report revealed that over ten top officials bore responsibility, including CEO Jagdishan, who allegedly verbally approved the disguised payments during senior-level discussions. Following this revelation, HDFC shares slid an additional 4.1% to close at $23.78.
The plaintiffs allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. They are seeking class certification, unspecified compensatory damages, and a jury trial, claiming the bank's executives acted with reckless disregard for the truth and heavily damaged investors who purchased artificially inflated shares before the regulatory breaches came to light.
ALSO READ: HDFC Bank Hammered Worst Since 2008: Why Retail Investors Feel The Pinch
Essential Business Intelligence, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice, Daily Fuel, Gold and Silver Prices and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.