On Tuesday, the Delhi High Court declined to order the release of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in connection with the alleged liquor policy scam, stating that it did not deem the arrest to be unlawful.
Additionally, the court emphasised that it was not within its purview to meddle in matters related to the issuance of election tickets or the purchase of electoral bonds.
-
Indian Markets Turning Corner After Two Tough Years, Says Sandeep Tandon -
NDTV Profit Ignite 2026: Experts See Opportunity In Equities, Stay Bullish For Long-Term -
Buy Right, Sit Tight Does Not Work for Individual Stocks, Says Dinshaw Irani -
'Worst Is Behind': Quant MF Sees Market Bottom, Flags 'Extreme Euphoria' In Midcaps -
India's Mutual Fund Industry Could Become A $1 Trillion Opportunity, Say Fund Managers -
'Foreign Investors Are Baraatis': Raamdeo Agrawal's Take On LTCG Tax -
Stay Invested Through Market Cycles: Raamdeo Agrawal at NDTV Profit Ignite -
Ramesh Damani Remains Bullish On India For Next 20-30 Years, Sees Bargains Amid Market Weakness -
CAS Came After A Long Consultation Process: SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey AT NDTV PROFIT IGNITE -
Aim To Cut FPI Onboarding Time From Mth To Five Days: SEBI Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey AT NDTV PROFI
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma underscored that judges are obligated to abide by the law and are not swayed by political considerations.
Kejriwal was detained by the Enforcement Directorate on March 21, in connection with the alleged liquor policy case. Prior to his arrest, Kejriwal had declined the central probe agency's summons on multiple occasions.
The Delhi High Court, after a hearing on April 3, had reserved its decision regarding the challenge to the arrest of Kejriwal. Senior Advocate Manu Singhvi, representing Kejriwal, contended that ensuring fair and transparent elections and preserving democratic principles necessitates a level-playing field.
He raised concerns about the timing of Kejriwal's arrest, insinuating that it might be a deliberate attempt to disrupt the activities of a political party in the run-up to elections.
On the other side, Assistant Solicitor General SV Raju, appearing for the Enforcement Directorate, argued that the Aam Aadmi Party qualified as an entity under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act .
He highlighted Kejriwal's significant role as the national convenor of AAP, asserting that this position conferred upon him substantial authority, including oversight of the party's financial affairs.
Both Kejriwal and his party have vehemently denied the agency's accusations, denouncing them as a conspiracy aimed at discrediting the AAP leader.
Essential Business Intelligence, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice, Daily Fuel, Gold and Silver Prices and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.