The government has moved to decisively remove long‑running uncertainty around the application of the General Anti‑Avoidance Rule (GAAR) on foreign investor exits, offering significant relief to private equity, venture capital and sovereign wealth funds with legacy India investments.
Through Notifications 54 and 55 of 2026, the Central Board of Direct Taxes has clarified that GAAR will not apply to income arising from the transfer of investments made before April 1, 2017, irrespective of when the exit occurs. The amendment to Rule 10U of the Income‑tax Rules also makes it explicit that tax authorities should not invoke GAAR in such cases, effectively ring‑fencing pre‑2017 investments from anti‑avoidance scrutiny.
The clarification comes at a time when global investors had grown increasingly concerned about the scope of GAAR, particularly after recent court rulings strengthened the substance‑over‑form doctrine in cross‑border tax matters.
ALSO READ | GST Collections In FY26 Grows In Single-Digit; March Proceeds Highest In 10 Months
“Global investors were very concerned that India has again introduced retrospective tax legislation. By the notifications issued yesterday, the Government and the Tax Department have shown they are keeping their word on tax certainty in India for foreign investors and proactively engaging with them in addressing their legitimate concerns,” said Pratibha Jain, Head of Strategy and Group General Counsel at Everstone Group and a member of the IVCA Executive Committee.
She said the intent of the notifications is clear. “The important thing is the clarification that investments prior to 2017 are not considered arrangements is sufficient messaging for the tax officers not to pursue the grandfathered cases, which seems to be the intent behind the notifications.”
Litigation backdrop raised stakes
The move assumes importance against the backdrop of high‑profile tax litigation involving offshore fund structures and treaty‑based exits. Notably, the Tiger Global case, linked to the 2018 Walmart‑Flipkart transaction, where the Supreme Court denied treaty protection to Mauritius‑based Tiger Global entities, emphasising lack of commercial substance and allowing GAAR‑linked principles to override treaty claims.
Tiger Global entities exited with capital gains of around ₹14,500 crore, with about ₹967 crore withheld by the tax department. The ruling, delivered earlier this year, triggered anxiety across the PE and VC ecosystem, especially among funds holding pre‑2017 investments through offshore structures.
Following the judgment, tax authorities also issued notices to several overseas VC and PE funds, seeking extensive information on their Mauritius and Singapore entities to examine commercial substance, adding to investor concerns around potential retrospective application of GAAR principles.
Notifications temper impact of court rulings
Legal experts say the latest notification significantly limits the fallout of such litigation for legacy investments.
“By extending GAAR grandfathering to all pre–1 April 2017 investments, the amendment removes a key area of interpretational uncertainty and significantly tempers the impact of the Supreme Court's Tiger ruling,” said Shaily Gupta, Partner at Khaitan & Co.
However, she cautioned that scrutiny has not gone away altogether. “Although it curtails the scope for revisiting legacy structures, treaty entitlement remains a live issue, with commercial substance continuing to be closely examined.”
The notification draws a firm line between the past and the future. While pre‑2017 investments are fully protected from GAAR, any tax benefit arising on or after April 1, 2017 from post‑2017 investments remains squarely within GAAR's ambit. This means offshore and treaty‑based structures will continue to be tested for substance, business purpose and control.
Impact on exits and deal certainty
For global funds, the clarification is expected to unlock exits that were delayed due to tax uncertainty, particularly IPO sell‑downs, secondary transactions and strategic sales involving long‑held investments. For Indian companies, it reduces valuation haircuts linked to tax risk and improves deal certainty where foreign shareholders are involved.
More broadly, the move signals a calibrated approach by the government - protecting past commitments while enforcing a tougher, substance‑driven regime going forward.
Essential Business Intelligence, Continuous LIVE TV, Sharp Market Insights, Practical Personal Finance Advice and Latest Stories — On NDTV Profit.