Bombay High Court Tells Vijay Mallya: Submit To Indian Jurisdiction Before Challenging FEO Act

Mallya has filed two petitions in the HC - one challenging an order declaring him as a fugitive economic offender and the other questioning the constitutional validity of the 2018 Act.

Advertisement
Read Time: 3 mins
Vijay Mallya has been based in the UK since 2016.
Quick Read
Summary is AI-generated, newsroom-reviewed
  • The Bombay HC will not hear Vijay Mallya's FEO Act challenge without his submission to Indian jurisdiction
  • Mallya, based in the UK since 2016, faces fraud and money laundering trial in India
  • Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed Mallya's pleas, citing fugitives should not challenge the law remotely
Did our AI summary help?
Let us know.

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday sent a clear message to fugitive businessman Vijay Mallya that the court will not consider his challenge to the Fugitive Economic Offenders (FEO) Act until he submits to Indian jurisdiction.

A bench of Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad also questioned when the businessman plans to return to India.

Advertisement

Mallya, based in the UK since 2016, has filed two petitions in the HC - one challenging an order declaring him as a fugitive economic offender and the other questioning the constitutional validity of the 2018 Act.

The HC posed the question to the 70-year-old liquor baron, wanted in India to face trial on fraud and money laundering charges, on his return home while hearing his twin pleas.

Advertisement

The court made it clear to the embattled businessman's counsel Amit Desai that it would not hear Mallya's plea against the Act unless he first submits himself to the court's jurisdiction.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Enforcement Directorate (ED), opposed the pleas arguing fugitives should not be permitted to challenge the validity of an Act without being subjected to courts of the country.

Advertisement

He submitted to the court that the FEO Act was brought to ensure such persons do not abuse the law by staying away from the country and filing petitions through their lawyers.

Mehta told the court that extradition proceedings initiated against Mallya were at an advanced stage.

The bench insisted it cannot allow both petitions filed by Mallya to run together and asked the promoter of the now-defunct Kingfisher Airlines to clarify which plea he wants to press and which one to withdraw.

Desai told the court that financial liability had been effectively neutralised with Mallya's assets worth Rs 14,000 crore attached and liabilities worth Rs 6,000 crore recovered by lending banks.

The Solicitor General maintained the fugitive businessman was entitled to legal representation even while staying abroad.

The bench, however, questioned as to how does one wipe out criminal liability without submitting to the jurisdiction of the court.

Advertisement

The HC posted the matter for further hearing on Feb. 12 by when Mallya will have to inform the court about which petition he wants to proceed with.

Mallya was declared a Fugitive Economic Offender in January 2019 by a special court hearing cases under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The businessman, accused of defaulting on multiple loan repayments and facing money laundering charges, left India in March 2016.

PNB Scam: Belgium Top Court Says No Risk Of Denial Of Justice To Mehul Choksi In India

Watch LIVE TV, Get Stock Market Updates, Top Business, IPO and Latest News on NDTV Profit.

Loading...